September 15, 2016

The difference between strength and toughness

Abstract: Metal strength and fracture toughness are important mechanical properties for structural components.  This article explains yield strength, tensile strength,  fracture toughness, the trade-offs between strength and toughness, and designing for applications requiring high strength and toughness.

Need help designing a component? We can help with alloy, coating, and process selection. See our metallurgy consulting page.

For structural components, strength and fracture toughness are two important mechanical properties.  Yield strength is the measure of the stress that a metal can withstand before deforming.  Tensile strength is a measure of the maximum stress that a metal can support before starting to fracture. Fracture toughness is a measure of the energy required to fracture a material that contains a crack.

As the yield strength increases, the amount of stress a metal can support without deforming increases.  Alternatively, as yield strength increases, a smaller cross-section of metal is required to support a given load without deforming.  As tensile strength increases, the amount of stress a metal can support without cracking and fracturing increases.  And as fracture toughness increases, the energy required to cause a crack to grow to fracture increases.  Low fracture toughness corresponds to low ductility.  For example, glass has very low toughness and is very brittle.

For a component with a crack of a certain length, as the fracture toughness decreases there is a decrease in the component’s ability to withstand the load before fracturing. Conversely, for a certain load, as fracture toughness increases, a component can tolerate a longer crack before fracturing.

Need help figuring out a component failure or quality problem? We can help. See our failure analysis page.

As shown in the figure, for any particular alloy, Strength vs. Toughness toughness decreases as strength increases. Consequently, when high toughness and high strength are both required it is often necessary to change from one alloy to a different alloy that satisfies both requirements.

Designers are often tempted to use a material that is as strong as possible to enable them to minimize component cross-section. However, this can inadvertently lead to using a material with insufficient fracture toughness to withstand fracturing if a small crack forms in the material during component manufacturing or during use.

Fatigue stress is also another cause of cracks. The formation of cracks in components exposed to fatigue conditions is often expected. In these situations, knowledge of the fracture toughness is required to determine how long the component can remain in service before a crack grows so long that the intact cross-section of the component cannot support the load, and the component fractures. This applies to aerospace components and pressure vessels such as boilers.

Want to improve your metallurgy and metals engineering knowledge? See our metallurgy courses page for training options.

For structural components exposed to fatigue conditions, designers must be concerned with both the strength and the toughness. The strength must be large enough so that the material can withstand the applied loads without deforming. The toughness must be sufficient for the metal to withstand the formation of fatigue cracks without failing catastrophically.

For more information read Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials by R.W. Hertzberg.  This book contains lots of information about the relationship between fracture toughness and strength.

Industrial Metallurgists, LLC

Providing metals engineering expertise for failure analysis and forensic investigations of metal components and products.

© 2022 — All rights reserved.

Terms & Conditions